Last weekend ACT for America helped organize multiple Anti-Sharia Protests across the United States of America. These protests were simply peaceful gatherings by people who rightly believe Sharia Law is incompatible with United States law and it has no place here. Of course, these days, anyone right of rabid progressive can’t organize and hold an event without people counter protesting just for the sake of being contrarian. At every anti-sharia protest, there were anti-anti-sharia protesters, partially made up of Antifa thugs and partially made up of hippy retards who don’t understand they’d be murdered if they ever found themselves in a country ruled by sharia law.
We’ve needed to have the honest discussion about where Islam fits into the United States for some time. Sharia law and Muslim traditions (if that’s what you want to call them?) have been slowly, but consistently creeping into the United States and just sort of accepted. That’s how we ended up with Muslims trying to argue that female genital mutilation is a religious right–they believe they cutting and destroying the genitals of young girls is a right in this country.
Michigan is currently being threatened as Muslim-majorities take over cities like Dearborn and the outskirts of Detroit and start enforcing Sharia and Muslim law. It’s difficult to discuss and criticize Islam because the moment you start to say something, you’re labeled an Islamophobe rather than having your ideas and positions actually listened to. Look, I’m of the belief that if you had a good argument against me or these ideas, you’d make it rather than trying to shut the conversation down altogether. Shutting the conversation down is a cheater way of getting out of the conversation because you know you’re going to lose. People do this in one-on-one arguments, especially by getting over-emotional and then trying to defer the conversation to the emotionality of the situation rather than the original topic–and they do it with important discussions we need to have like how does Islam fit into the United States.
The short answer is: it doesn’t. There should be zero mosques in the United States and there should be zero Muslims in the United States unless they are visiting from their countries.
Muslims aren’t coming here because they love the United States and its values. They aren’t coming to assimilate, but they’re coming to change our laws and try to cow and manipulate us into their way of life. The fact that we even have to have anti-sharia law protests in America is proof of that. Sharia law is a foreign form a law and it cannot be practiced while the United States practices the constitution. One stands, one falls. “But there are so few of them…” and yet they are pushing to change our laws. Question: Why come here if you hate the laws and hate the culture? They’re using their ‘minority status’ to call themselves persecuted and oppressed in an attempt to strongarm their rules over ours.
You’ve got leftists and progressives defending Sharia and arguing Islam is only a religion while they ignore the actual legislation and legal changes that it calls for. You’ve got anti-Christian leftists demanding every reference of God be removed from the public eye with students getting in trouble for praying over their lunches, but with Islam being taught in classrooms and the Pledge of Allegiance being recited in Arabic, replacing “one nation under God”, with “one nation under Allah,” and no outrage.
In 1996, Bill Clinton was the first US president to hold a celebration at the White House in honor of the end of Ramadan. The celebration is called Eid al-Fitr and it includes six Takbirs, the raising of hands and shouting, “Allahu Akbar!” in declaration that Allah is greater (than the god of any/all other religions).
Considering how the media has aggressively gone after Trump and the Republican National Committee, but the RNC was the first to openly include a Muslim prayer to Allah in 2000.
In 2007, the official holy book in which our political officers are sworn in was switched up. That’s not to say the Bible isn’t still used majorly, but in 2007, the Quran was first used to swear in Congressman Keith Ellison (D). Ellison was exposed as a Jew-hating, terrorist sympathizer and it was just this year that he went head-to-head for DNC chair. If you’re swearing yourself into public service on a foreign government’s laws and religion, you’re not entering the government to protect local laws, culture, or traditions. You’re working to infiltrate and destroy from the inside.
Here’s just a snippet about him:
For one thing, Ellison didn’t merely defend Farrakhan, he was a follower. He didn’t only appear as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam, he appeared to defend a Minneapolis anti-Semite who said “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Ellison didn’t just support Stokely Carmichael’s right to speak at the University of Minnesota on free speech grounds, he argued that a man who claimed Zionists had joined the Nazis in killing Jews was a useful ideological counterpoint at that school. Ellison wasn’t just critical of “Israel’s policy toward Palestinians,” he was critical of the idea of Israel altogether.
When Mother Jones interviewed a classmate of Ellison’s who claimed he had gone around saying “European white Jews are trying to oppress minorities all over the world” and talked about “Jewish slave traders” — typical rhetoric for Nation of Islam types — there was no denial from the congressman’s office. The congressman only distanced himself from anti-Semites during his 2006 run for Congress, and then only when right-wing bloggers started pointing out his past.
This man is among the highest leaders of the DNC today. You’re not fighting to defend the American people when you’re swearing on foreign gods and political systems…
In 2008, a Christian US soldier at Baghram Air Force Base in Afghanistan received Bibles in two local languages from his American church as planned. The US military confiscated those Bibles and instead of at least returning them to his church, burned all of them. By contrast, when Terry Jones, a pastor in Florida, announced his plan to burn a copy of the Quran in 2010, General David Petraeus, the commander of the US military in Afghanistan, publicly objected to his plan, while US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced his plan as “disgraceful.”
As Sharia creeps ever more into our country, our laws and morals cannot be upheld if we hold foreign values over our own. You just have to look at the simple mechanics and beliefs of Sharia to know they don’t believe in the rights of the individual or what is good. They believe in one thing: supremacy. Here’s an easy example:
In the landmark 2010 pro-Sharia ruling on S.D. v. M.J.R., Judge Joseph Charles Jr. concluded that the Muslim ex-husband repeatedly had raped his Muslim ex-wife, both before and after their divorce. After testimony from the Muslim man’s imam, however, the judge denied the ex-wife’s request for a permanent restraining order against her ex-husband, citing the Muslim man’s “belief” and “practices”: “The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices.”
We couldn’t uphold the law and protect this woman who was repeatedly raped because it’s their ‘belief’ that it’s okay. We cannot uphold the American idea that every person is a free person, able to secure their own safety if we subscribe to sharia or the ideas of Islam.
Recently Tucker Carlson interviewed Blair Imani, a Muslim convert of 2 years. She demands that taxpayers in America fund ‘safe spaces’ for Muslims to discuss their ideas without being reproached and continuously mentions surveillance. Watch:
What she’s calling for is nothing short of what Sharia calls for: restrictions on free speech. She wants to be able to inspired violence and hatred in the name of Islam and to make criticizing her and her bad ideas illegal. For every mosque that’s been investigated, guns, weapons, bombs of all kinds of been found. This is happening all over the world! She pushes surveillance removal because she knows what’s happening in mosques and she wants you to be stupid about it.
The found fathers had something to say on immigration. According to the Naturalization Act of 1790, immigration restricted citizenship to “any alien, being a free white person” who had been in the U.S. for two years.
It also stated: “The Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support the Constitution. It also mandated that one must “absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign Prince, Potentate, State or Sovereignty.” Despite its generous terms extending citizenship to all children of citizens, it denied the right to naturalize to “persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.” The law’s use of the phrase, “free white person,” also excluded blacks and immigrants of other races from being eligible for citizenship. In 1795, as anti-immigrant feeling began to grow, the necessary period of residence was increased to five years. Without the right to naturalize, immigrants would not be able to vote and would have no political voice or power.”
This means those who come to America’s door with sharia in mind shouldn’t have ever been allowed in. Its allegiance to a foreign body and if you follow sharia, you cannot pledge yourself to the United States. This also goes for all the illegal immigrants coming into the country. They show poor moral character and as they wave Mexican flags, they have not given up their original country and have not sworn allegiance to the United States. Any person found violating these requirements should immediately be ejected from the country and barred entry.
I think we need to return to these rules as they are. As we allow more foreign people to take place in the American political system, they do not uphold American values. Instead, they try to instill the values of their country. No political leader should attempt to undermine the very foundation of the country. The job of every political leader in the Unites States is to uphold the law, but first and foremost, to uphold the constitution. Slowly, but surely, our political leaders have been getting further and further away from that until we’ve gotten to the point we’re at now where our youth don’t even know what’s in the constitution and some even feel so ‘triggered’ by the mention of it, they want it burned.
Thomas Jefferson read the Quran in 1801 to understand why the Muslims might pirate their boats. He learned that the Muslim holy book commanded the faithful to “plunder and enslave” non-Muslims.
In 1814, President John Adams wrote to Jefferson, “Islam’s founder and prophet was a military fanatic,” and in a future letter he condemned Islamic law as contemptible. His son and future president, John Quincy Adams, went further, arguing that the essence of Islam is “violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.” He suggested the Quran’s commands to fight and conquer other lands “in the cause of Allah” were at odds with democracy, peace and the Judeo-Christian ethic on which America was founded.
“The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Muhammad is the prophet of God,” he added. “The vanquished may purchase their lives by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Muslim creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike by fraud or by force.”
Up until 1934, the Muslim population in the United States was virtually nothing. 1934, however, was the year the first mosque was established in the US. However, it wasn’t until the 1960s where the Muslim population really started to move into the US. It took 250+ years for the Muslim population in America to reach 150,000 (0.8% of the population), however, it’s projected to take only twenty to more than double that percentage with 1.7% by 2030.
I’ve seen news reports recently trying to spark this idea that “Muslims helped create the United States.” If by help create, you mean pirating our trade ships and inspiring laws to stop them from coming in, then yes, they did inspire more divide. They inspired our founding fathers to investigate the politics and ban and condemn the teachings of the Quran, but Muslims as a whole had nothing to do with the creation of the Constitution or the moral values of the United States.
And according to our history, it should be kept that way.
Islam has no place in the United States. It should not be welcomed. It shouldn’t even be up for debate. We shouldn’t be having protests or having to sign legislation to ban sharia law on a state-by-state basis. For foreigners to come in and demand we replace our laws with theirs is not them immigration, it’s them invading. We are in the middle of a war. They’re not just fighting with gun and bombs and knives and cars, but also with the guilt they think they can pull with a ‘minority’ card. With psyop games we’ve been taught to fall for as we’re told to be ashamed of our past, our strength, our leaders, and our values.
It’s top to stop Islam in the west. It’s time to return our country to strength. It’s time to remove every last visitor here who does not meet the standards and abide by our law.
It’s time to return America’s Law, Order, and Identity.