11 Confessions From the Left in 2016: Abridged!

According to Clinton insider, Larry Nichols, one of the main democratic strategies for success it projection. That is, you accuse your opponent of doing the things you’re actually guilty of. By using projection, you’re able to create fuller, more detailed lies because you actually have insider, specific information (referencing the things you’ve already done). With the continual distrust of the people toward the media, more details are necessary for reporting agencies to prove they aren’t lying. The democrats have played dirty for a long time, so it’s not surprising that one of their main strategies this election cycle was projection.

With that in mind, let’s take into considering everything they’ve accused their opposition of doing and consider their accusations as if they were confessions–because if projections are just tossing your guilt onto someone else, then isn’t what they’ve done just eager confession? Here’s a recap of some of the left’s biggest ‘confessions’ from the last year:

1. They Admitted to Their Bias Behaviors

How many times have we heard the call of “Sexist!” and “Racist” over the last couple of years? Well, it’s not because racism is actually on the rise, but actually, a lot of the left’s yelling can be taking as admittance as guilt and here’s why:

A huge part of leftist rhetoric for the past who knows how long has been that conservatives are racist. Just spend a couple hours watching Hillary’s America or reading up on American history to discover that the Dems have actually always been very focused on race. They were the founders of the KKK, they wanted the Jim Crow laws, and most recently, they were the ones saying if you didn’t vote for Obama or you just don’t think he was a good leader, it’s because you are racist.

This election cycle has done more to underline the racism behind progressive and liberal rhetoric and it likely only came out stronger because of the current ‘migrant’ crisis happening in Europe. Besides calling every one of Trump’s supporters racist from the get go, we saw an increase in racist language every time Bernie Sanders lost during the primary, just take a look at the Reddit subforums for Bernie and/or Hillary.

This thread is titled, Does anyone else appreciate the irony of them blaming black people for “voting against their own interests” because they’re “low-information,” and then not voting for the candidate who is most similar to Bernie Sanders in the general?

Every time Bernie seemed to lose a state, there was outrage on subreddit and other like-forums with people blaming blacks for Bernie’s loss, insulting their intelligence, and referring to them as if they were subhuman–but in the same breath would declare all Trump supporters racist.

Let’s look at another example: Ben Carson.

The left tends to believe it owns every demographic outside of white men. If you watched the news over the last 18 months, you saw every time someone deviated from the expected liberalism, they were assaulted. Ben Carson was victim to rabid racial attacks from the left, newspapers, and commentators just because he is a black conservative. The people who scream “all whites are racist” were the same ones calling Dr. Carson “Uncle Tom,” who made jabs at his intelligence for being conservative, and who completely wrote off his skills and abilities as a doctor as simply being ‘affirmative action.’

They left went after women in the same way. The Young Turks host Ana, among many MSM hosts insulted women who voted for Trump, attacked women who voted for Trump because again, the left assumes they own every demographic outside of white men. They spend so much time duping on white men, but they figured they could because anyone nonwhite or without a penis owes them their loyalty. This election showed them how wrong they were.

Then take note that if you do not agree with liberal ideals, but you fall under any category other than white male, you are automatically made into an ‘honorary white.’ To liberals, race isn’t about your genes or the color of your skin; it’s equivalent to an ideology. This is why you’re ‘kicked out’ and demonized if your opinions don’t match. They’ve done this with ‘LGBT’ members as well. It’s not race, sex, or sexuality, it’s all one ideology.

Need another example? Look at the backlash Kanye West has received for just showing support to Donald Trump.

1482783369175.jpgA few other things to consider for liberal racism consider the way liberals say you can’t be racist against whites, whenever people mention killing whites, it’s all a joke or it’s a good thing, whichever is convenient at the time. The people who were attacked for attending Trump rallies deserved it. Or here’s Symone Sanders laughing at violence against whites. Here’s the same person saying, ‘we don’t need white people leading the democratic party.’

For every time the left has called you racist, consider it an admittance of their own guilt. It’s nothing against you.

2. They Admitted They Don’t Care About Women & Perpetuate Sexual Abuse

You may recall that during the last couple of months of the presidential campaign, many women came out and claimed Trump raped or otherwise sexually assaulted them at some point. This all seemed to happen shortly after InfoWars’ “Bill Clinton is a rapist” contest came about. The accusations were likely in response to redirect attention from Bill Clinton’s crimes as Trump also brought attention to Clinton’s victims by meeting with them and inviting them to the debates.

Blocking out these women was important for Hillary’s campaign because she was preaching herself as a champion for women, yet if you look into Bill’s predatorial past, you’d find that Hillary Clinton not only defended her husband’s attacks on these women, but intimidated them, threatened them, tried to silence them to keep him out of trouble. She also defended a child rapist, a man who attacked a 12-year-old girl and did so much damage she fell into a comma and became infertile.

Yeah, great champion for women you got there.

She insulted these women as ‘bimbos,’ claiming that some of them asked for it. Recently she’s also been implicated in a child sex-ring scandal known as PizzaGate due to the emails of her close friend and campaign manager, John Podesta. For a quick summary on PizzaGate, check out some of David Seaman’s videos or the videos of many other independent investigators on Youtube.

It’s noteworthy that the sexual assault accusations against Trump all came out within about a 48 hour period and the news jumped on them as quickly as they could, writing as many articles and tweets as possible in an attempt to put this information at the top of the news cycle and get it stuck in people’s heads. However, all of these accusations came crumbling apart almost instantly and as accusers backed off, and their stories became disproven, the media was NOT as quick or eager to report.

My theory is the law on libel, where news agencies have just so much time to retract a false story. If they spam the news cycle with fake news and then remove it all a week later while submitting a single ‘retraction’ notice, no one is going to notice when all the fake news has disappeared: the news cycle has already moved on. It was basically all a scam to cover up the sex crimes the Clinton’s have been involved in.

They don’t care about women, they just care about pigeon holing you and manipulating your emotions, especially in the case that you have a vagina.

3. They Admitted to Inciting Violence and Political Intimidation

Starting early on, MSM newscasters had their scripts prepared: “Donald Trump’s causes violence at his rallies!”

It feels like we heard these lines every other day, on every news station, and sometimes from other presidential candidates. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton both accused Trump of causing violence with his ‘racist rhetoric, but they weren’t the only ones. Some of the Republican candidates also said it, including Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich. Perhaps only the only republican candidate who didn’t accuse Trump of causing violence was Ben Carson.

Thanks to Project Veritas, we had the truth confirmed: the Clinton Campaign was paying people to incite violence at Trump Rallies.

They put ads up on Craigslist, paying people by the hour, to be disruptive. They brought protesters in by bus, paid for some of their hotel, and attempted to make the false narrative of “Trump’s words cause violence” a reality. Luckily, that failed.

Then the second part to this was people coming forward saying they were being affected by hate crimes committed by Trump supporters. You might remember my post a few weeks ago, “Why Do Liberals Lie So Much?” which was a response to all the falsehoods coming out just after Trump was elected. These false flag claims of racism weren’t new. Since Harambe’s death earlier this year, it seems like the false flag, self-victimizing crimes have skyrocketed.

Unfortunately for all the good people out there, because liberals are lying so much about crimes and violence, it’s hard to take any claims seriously. I know by default I assume they’re all lying until they prove otherwise because you know… there’s just… a handful of cases to go off like:

The list of situations like these seems never ending…

4. They Admitted They are Poor Sports & Cheaters

Do you remember when, during the third debate Trump said he would wait to see the results of the election before he would accept them, and how social media, MSM, and the Clinton Campaign blew up by saying he was acting childish, he was being a sore loser, and he was a threat to democracy? Cause I sure can.

Then do you recall how between November 9th and December 19th, the democrats and their allies, including the RINOs, tried everything within their power to stop Trump from being officiated as the president elect at the elector vote? They tried to claim voter fraud after they spent months saying voter fraud wasn’t real, it was impossible, it was just Trump being a poor sport. In fact, it was just a couple weeks prior to the election that Obama had ridiculed Trump for suggesting voter fraud and then claimed it was impossible. They had mobs threaten electors to vote against Trump. Jill Stein called for a recount in 4 specific states–no, they weren’t states with the smallest voting margin. They were all just swing states Trump won. CNN and other MSM hosts were calling for a recast in all states with no proof. The CIA, known for spreading false information, was threatening to ‘visit’ electors to ‘debrief’ them, when still, no information had been found that pointed to foreign interference in the election.

Then there were the days of rioting and looting in the streets that took place just after the election. They burned flags, threatened assassination, destroyed cities, blocked off large roads, and did literally nothing to convince anyone they were right about anything, but hey, they had nothing better to do, right? Because we already assumed and then knew that liberals were causing violence at Trump Rallies, we sort of figured they’d riot after we won–but if you need any more confirmation, you have people like Sally Kohn going ahead and confessing for us:

kohn

Then after all this, we get the adolescent, virtue signal of a hashtag #NotMyPresident. It’s like a child yelling at their parent, “YOU’RE NOT MY DAD” because the kid didn’t get what it wanted. Unless any of these people are moving out of the country, then, yeah, not sorry, Trump is your president.

At this moment we still have mobs of people threatening to march and picket the inauguration. Jokes on them when security at the inauguration is about 1000x more serious than the security at rallies–to which the security there was still pretty serious. I don’t know if they realize inauguration security… has guns.

We’ve also got Obama and many others ‘on his side’ saying they’re going to fight every little thing–and not for the betterment of the American people, but just because they hate Trump and didn’t want him to win. Let that sink in; Obama hates the American people so much, he doesn’t want what’s better for them, he wants to fight with someone he hates more, to slow him down, and hopefully hurt the American people in the process. I don’t know how anyone can still support this abomination of a president.

Let’s not forget the bombshell earlier this year as Bernie struggled to stay afloat during the primaries because the tides were stacked against him the whole time.

“One email from DNC Deputy Communications Director Eric Walker to several DNC staffers cites two news articles showing Sanders leading in Rhode Island and the limited number of polling locations in the state: “If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually.””

“The release provides further evidence the DNC broke its own charter violations by favoring Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee, long before any votes were cast.

Over the past several weeks, Guccifer 2.0 released several internal memos showing DNC staff strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee—as early as March 2015. In June 2016, Florida-based law firm, Beck & Lee, filed a class action lawsuit against Wasserman Schultz and the DNC based on the revelations from these leaked files.”

Read a recap of admitted guilt at The Observer.

5. They Admitted to Working with the Media to Go After Trump

During the regrouping after the election and during the period of new scheming, the democratic party speculated on what contributed to Hillary Clinton’s loss. One of their answers was the obvious: Americans are sexist and unready to break the ‘final glass ceiling.” They pressed that Russia had something to do with the election results, though they could show no evidence to the point where Putin told Obama to either put up evidence of interference or shut up. No evidence came to light.

Then, mixed into all of that, a couple of TV hosts, Obama, and some MSM reporters came to the conclusion that Trump won because the media was far too easy on him and far more critical of Clinton. That’s funny. I don’t remember the media ever criticizing Clinton for much of anything during her campaign, yet Trump submitted a picture of himself eating a taco bowl on Cinco de Mayo and the media tore it apart, scrutinizing him for being racist for eating a taco bowl.

What’s more interesting is that in late October, early November, we received an unwilling admittance of guilt of the democratic party. Wikileaks revealed massive collusion between the Clinton Campaign and the mainstream media through the podesta emails. One example includes, Donna Brazile (CNN contributor at the time, and current DNC Chairman now) leaked CNN town hall questions to Hillary Clinton’s staff prior to the debate. Read the link above to hear 9 more damning pieces of evidence for political collusion and to see the sources.

We’ve also seen Morning Joe host, Mika Brzezinski admit the Clinton Campaign called MSNBC and wanted to pull her off the air for being critical of Hillary Clinton:

If anyone actually watched the news, read the articles, and followed the election, then you know the media was incredibly critical of Trump while they ignored any and all criticism of Hillary Clinton to the point that it was untruthful and unfair. The media actually had far too much coverage of Trump, that if it weren’t all hyperbolic and fake, it would have been unfair to Clinton, because at least in that regard, she really wasn’t getting half as much exposure as Trump, even if he was only getting negative press.

6. They Admitted They Publish and Popularize Fake News

There is little more paramount from the tail end of 2016 than the left’s push for ‘fake news and propaganda.’ It’s important to note that the rise in the discussion of ‘fake news’ came out about the same time PizzaGate was beginning to unravel.

1481161259275

From here, MSM newscasters began to paint just about everything that came from sources other than themselves as fake news. CNN even went so far as to say looking at WikiLeaks documents was illegal for anyone who wasn’t them.

What makes this even more paramount is that on Friday, December 23rd, while everyone in America was settling in with hot chocolate and their families, preparing for the holiday weekend ahead, Obama signed into law a bill that puts the CIA in charge of the news we get. He calls it the “Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act” and is effectively unconstitutional as it puts the government in charge of censoring anything written by the people whom they deem unworthy.

Why was this bill needed? It’s not like fake information hasn’t been around since the dawn of man. Ever since humans have been able to tell the truth, they’ve been able to lie and ever since lying was profitable, there has always been people lying. Also, who wants to bet this bill will not affect any MSM networks or companies who have been proven liars through the last 24 months of falsehoods and the Podesta emails? We’ve got boatloads of evidence that the leftist media lies, yet they never stop claiming that everyone BUT them are the liars. This is not for the protection of the people, this is for the protection of the power the 1%ers have. This is America’s Ministry of Truth and with it, we continue down the path of year 2016 going on 1984.

To quote Michael Finkle, “It’s not “fake news” that should bother you. It’s the inability of a major segment of society (mind you often college educated) to use rational thought and methods to weigh out what’s right or wrong.”

7. They Admitted They Don’t Believe in Free Speech

Following up the last confession, it should be obvious: as the left admits to writing fake news, they also want to stop you from calling it out. They’re all in agreement: they support free speech… as long as what you’re saying is what they believe. They aren’t interested in hearing different opinions, they aren’t interested in being challenged. They aren’t interested in debate. They aren’t even interested in just letting you have your own opinions.

Take this article for example:

“I was working my way through examples of how some people’s sense of personal ethics was more liberal than the letter of the law,” he said in an email.

For example, he told them, many people might roll through a stop sign on a deserted country road, deeming it morally acceptable, even if unlawful.

Such is the cost of a small misstep in a crushingly politically correct world.
In other words, he said, in a pluralistic democracy, there’s often “a difference between people’s private morality and the law.

“I find abortion to be wrong,” he said, as another illustration of this gap, “but the law is often different from our personal opinions.”

That was it, the teacher said. “It was just a quick exemplar, nothing more. And we moved on.”

A little later, the class had a five-minute break, and when it resumed, several students didn’t return, among them a popular young woman who had gone to an administrator to complain that what the teacher said had “triggered” her such that she felt “unsafe” and that, in any case, he had no right to an opinion on the subject of abortion because he was a man.

Read how the rest of the story turns out here: Christie Blatchford: B.C. teacher fired for having the wrong opinion.

This is not a singular case of this happening. Conservatives and libertarians specifically are being targeted in an attempt to silence opposing views. In the article above, the professor did nothing more than say he didn’t agree with abortion in passing, as an example to what he was talking about, and yet a handful of students felt it necessary to report that because being met with a different opinion made them feel unsafe.

Even WashingtonPost has written an article titled: ‘Liberal intolerance is on the rise on America’s college campuses,’ which reads,

“Okay, maybe conservatives are right to freak out about illiberal lefty militancy on college campuses.

Today’s students are indeed both more left wing and more openly hostile to free speech than earlier generations of collegians.

Don’t believe me? There are hard data to prove it.

For 50 years, researchers have surveyed incoming college freshmen about everything from their majors to their worldviews. On Thursday, the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles released the latest iteration of this survey, which included 141,189 full-time, first-year students attending about 200 public and private baccalaureate institutions around the country.”

Across the country conservative and liberal events have been shut down via protesting, have been disrespectfully interrupted, like Milo’s event in West Virginia where communists triggered the fire alarm multiple times in an attempt to shut down his event or let’s just mention the many non-liberal speakers who were forced to cancel their events entirely because Chicago was too intolerant and the police force there was either too weak or too corrupt to do anything.

To name a few:

Even if you don’t like them, you should stand for their free speech because their ability to open discussion = your ability to open discussion and the sharing of ideas. If you believe you’re smarter or more right than your opponent, than prove it through respectful discourse, not attempt at silencing. Facts say everything. Proof says everything.

Universities around the country banning non-liberal speakers is on the rise. Another way censorship has been instilled by liberals is by labeling everything some kind of ism or by calling everyone they don’t like some kind of ‘ist’. If you’re just a racist, sexist problem, then they can discredit everything you say. If they can discourage you from sharing the ideas and thoughts you have that are different than theirs, then they will be able to shape your thoughts. If they are able to shape your thoughts, they are able to shape your behavior and then they have total control.

Note: To defend free speech you don’t have to like everything everyone says. You don’t have to agree with it and you can think the things people say are disgusting, however, if you believe there are ‘buts’ to “I support freedom of speech” then you don’t understand what the defense of free speech is. No one needs to defend the spreading of popular ideas. The defense of freedom of speech is specifically for the least popular ideas–and you know why America works on this? Because CAPITALISM rewards those we the people agree with and does not reward those who are nasty. So like it or not, you are either for freedom or against it and with the left’s policing and constant fingerpointing that Trump will end freedom of speech, you know what they’re guilty of. Heck, Trump didn’t even get into office before free speech was restricted… by Obama… with his pet “Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act.”

quote-free-speech-is-meant-to-protect-unpopular-speech-popular-speech-by-definition-needs-neal-boortz-3-21-69

Quick side note, but take into account that hearing controversial opinions like, “I don’t agree with abortion” will get you fired because leftists, but if you say, “All I want for Christmas is white genocide” it’s free speech and liberals defend it.

8. They Admitted to Being Con-Artists

Isn’t it interesting that just as Clinton Cash came out, revealing how the Clinton Foundation stole MILLIONS from the Haitians trying to recover from a disastrous tropical storm, they began to point fingers at Trump University for being a scam? Isn’t it also funny how Hillary, and her aiding media, buried the story that her and Bill bagged $16.46 million from a ‘for profit university’ known as Laureate Education, but we didn’t hear much about that, did we? I’m not defending Trump University or speaking on its behalf whatsoever, but doesn’t it seem slightly hypocritical to bash on a ‘scam’ university when you’re involved in one yourself?

Don’t you find it slightly hypocritical to call others scam artists when you take donations through your ‘foundation’ to ‘help people’ and use those funds to pay for your daughter’s wedding?

Don’t you find it slightly hypocritical to call others scam artists when it was discovered that the state department, which YOU ran, was found seeking major land deals with a Nigerian firm who has ties to your private foundation?

Don’t you find it slightly ironic that every time Hillary & Co. point at someone with accusations, there is literally 4 fingers pointing back at herself?

You need more? Here are 10 Scandals Involving Hillary Clinton You May Have Forgotten.

9. They Admitted They Just Don’t Like You

I’ll give them this one: they didn’t actually accuse conservatives or Trump of not liking the people or wanting them to be stupid. However, through forced confession of the Podesta emails, we got to read this delightful gem:

email

Good to know they like their supporters, not because of who they are and what they stand for, but because they’re stupid and compliant. Thanks, Dems!

10. They Admitted That They Lie… And Find It Imperative to Being a Politician

I will never forget watching the second debate, just after Wikileaks released some new Clinton emails. One of the hosts actually had the gall to ask Clinton about the content in one of her emails. This was one of the first times the moderators went off script and you could tell it pissed Clinton off… The question was in regards to an email that reads, “But If Everybody’s Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position. You just have to sort of figure out how to — getting back to that word, “balance” — how to balance the public and the private efforts that are necessary to be successful, politically, and that’s not just a comment about today.”

She later blames Honest Abe Lincoln for her lies, stating, “I was making the point that it is hard sometimes to get the congress to do what you want to do. Politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be.” Basically stating you say whatever you have to, to change whatever you want, however you want it.

11. They Admitted to Treason

1481731054743.jpgYou know, I want to say that the Russian-team up scheme of Trump/Putin/Alt-Right/Everyone is Russian will not only go down in the history books as a major conspiracy of the early 2000 era, but also in some iteration of the DSM, some version of paranoia, known as Ruskinoia or rednoia or something… because if you weren’t for Clinton, well, then Gosh Darn it, that’s how they knew you were a Russian Agent!

It was very interesting to see this develop, as twitter handles changed to KGB before everyone went to Deplorable. It was interesting to see everyone having such a good time with it–and I know it wasn’t just conservatives running with it. It was every free-thinker out there who just wanted to have fun and recognized the ridiculousness in the conspiracy.

However fun it was, it shouldn’t be discredited just how serious a claim it was. Clinton was basically accusing Trump of committing treason… which is funny only because she’s been treasonous for almost her entire career. Even during her campaign she was accepting gifts and donations from foreign governments… who then had sway in the American political system. Ya know, while Saudi Arabia was whispering in one here, she was pointing with the other saying Trump had allegiances elsewhere.

Just 13 Acts of Treason in her Own Words Includes:

  1. Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday
  2. Saudi Sheikh won’t donate money to Clinton Foundation unless he receives a phone call from Bill Clinton. Staff responds: Bill won’t do it “unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check”
  3. Iran Deal (which Hillary negotiated and defends) “condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf”. John Podesta responds with “Yup”
  4. Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta owned 75,000 shares in Putin-connected energy company
  5. Transcripts from Hillary Clinton’s lucrative closed-door paid speeches delivered to elite financial firms and other special interests groups (see attachments)
  6. Clinton staff conspiring to stage ‘leaking’ of favorable excerpts from wall street speech, in efforts to calm down the public while leaving out more damaging parts
  7. Leaked private speech, Clinton: “You Need Both A Public And A Private Position” (mentioned above)
  8. Leaked private speech, Clinton: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”
  9. Leaked private speech transcript shows Clinton’s warm ties to Wall Street’s most powerful figures
  10. Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: “Wall Street was only accountable for the financial crisis for political reasons.
  11. Leaked private speech, Clinton: US will “ring China with missile defense” and has right to rename Pacific Ocean the “American Sea” (see attachments)
  12. Hillary Clinton flipped her public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive” by Labor
  13. Clinton speechwriter: “We are trying to find a good way to leak her opposition to the pipeline without her having to actually say it”

And all these were only just exposed in the last 18 months. There’s much more going on than we’ve been privy to and with any luck, we will discover all the traitors and get rid of them. They don’t even cover the 20% of US Uranium that Clinton sold to Putin for a donation to her foundation.

The funny thing is, though, during the campaign, as one of their tactics, they started #TraitorTrump without actually putting any thought into it. They didn’t think about how Trump had never held office, he’d never had any classified information, and so any of his business he did with foreign countries had literally nothing to do with the American political system. Yet Clinton did hold office, she was taking favors as shown in the above emails, and by all definitions is a traitor to the United States of America.

I could go on about the scandels and happenings of 2016 for.. So many pages. There are so many books to be written about what exactly just happened in this election cycle. This doesn’t even cover HillarysHealth, the endless twists on what conservatives/Trump said at rallies, BREXIT, the DNC or RNC, the changing climate of Europe, the political and social movements of the year, or the many political figureheads that have risen out of the movements from this year and could easily fall if they aren’t honest about themselves.

I’ll keep those ideas nearby. For now, I wish you and your family a Happy New Year. I believe it was Dave Cullen who called 2016, “the Year of Resistance” and he’s right… it was one hellova year. I hope that in 2017, we move from just resistance into conquering and taking back what is ours.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s